tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12321277.post1466997333434012168..comments2023-03-28T05:24:39.859-04:00Comments on Tracer: Nikons New D3, D300 and NikkorsPaul T.http://www.blogger.com/profile/00738774334132650343noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12321277.post-45406276470840430482008-04-08T00:45:00.000-04:002008-04-08T00:45:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12321277.post-6406860241701063782007-08-24T12:40:00.000-04:002007-08-24T12:40:00.000-04:00Steve: Noise Ninja is awesome, but even it can't ...Steve: Noise Ninja is awesome, but even it can't fix the noise of ISO 3200 on the D200 (that's the max right there).<BR/><BR/>Adam:<BR/>Re-reading my post I didn't get my point across in the way I had intended. 4mm at the wide end is a lot. And I would rather have a 24-70 than a 28-70. My point being, developing and making a lens of this level is a big undertaking. I'm just surprised they went through all that trouble to only give us 4 more mm and a new coating. They should have gone all out and included VR.<BR/><BR/>And yah, I'm worried about the next set of primes :(Paul T.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00738774334132650343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12321277.post-86853605281079620672007-08-24T12:34:00.000-04:002007-08-24T12:34:00.000-04:00@Steve: No Nikon since the D100 offers ISO 6400. T...@Steve: No Nikon since the D100 offers ISO 6400. That will change when the D3/D300 ship.<BR/><BR/>@Tracer: I'd have to disagree with you about the 24-70. Those 4mm are a very big deal. 28mm is just barely wide, I know I regularly hit my head against the 28mm isn't wide enough issue on a regular basis with my 28-70 Tokina on the F100. A 24-70 would be in my bag if anyone other than Sigma had offered one in F mount previously. 24mm is wide enough for most every situation.<BR/><BR/>As to the G thing, we're going to have to live with it. I don't really mind it so much with zooms, as I'd never want to put a f2.8 zoom on my F2A (Handles very poorly), but the next set of prime updates is gonna suck. As to the 14-24, to me it looks more interesting on DX (21-36mm-e) than on FF, although it really could be fun on the F100.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12321277.post-27187820725671488912007-08-24T09:42:00.000-04:002007-08-24T09:42:00.000-04:00Wow, it killed the links in my comment even though...Wow, it killed the links in my comment even though they previewed correctly.<BR/><BR/>Okay, I'll go simpler:<BR/><BR/>Noise Ninja -- http://www.picturecode.com/<BR/><BR/>[daily dose of imagery] photoblog that I found it at -- http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/ , in the About pageStevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06631953418699241207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12321277.post-63699457622646916992007-08-24T08:54:00.000-04:002007-08-24T08:54:00.000-04:00Maybe Pentax will announce a bunch of kickass new ...Maybe Pentax will announce a bunch of kickass new cameras now. Then I'll really be in trouble. :-)<BR/><BR/>You mentioned how ISO 6400 isn't usable for you now? I'm guessing that's from noise, not some other total brokenness of it?<BR/><BR/>If so, you might want to try Noise Ninja (if you haven't already). I had some really good results when I tried it out. <A HREF="http://www.picturecode.com" REL="nofollow"/><BR/><BR/>(I found out about it at the About page of <A HREF="http://wvs.topleftpixel.com" REL="nofollow"/> ]Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06631953418699241207noreply@blogger.com